<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Threshold Investment Properties &#187; Transportation</title> <atom:link href="http://thresholdstl.com/category/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thresholdstl.com</link> <description>Taking the St. Louis foreclosure, rehab, rental and multifamily real estate investor to the next level</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Mississippi River Bridge breaking ground</title><link>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-breaking-ground</link> <comments>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-breaking-ground#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Matt Kastner</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interstate-70]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mississippi River Bridge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[riverfront]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thresholdstl.com/?p=2415</guid> <description><![CDATA[
After years of waiting, the formal groundbreaking is now set for the new Mississippi River Bridge in downtown St. Louis. Meant to create a direct route from Missouri to Illinois along Interstate-70, this $670 million project will be breaking ground Friday, February 26th at 12:30pm.
Come 2014, this project could really bring some major changes to [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="width: 290px; float:left; margin-right: 5px;"> <img
src="http://thresholdstl.com/blog/uploaded_images/2010/02/under-construction-dig.jpg" alt="This image has no alt text" /></p><p>After years of <a
href="http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-st-louis-progresses">waiting</a>, the formal groundbreaking is now set for the new Mississippi River Bridge in downtown St. Louis. Meant to create a direct route from Missouri to Illinois along Interstate-70, this $670 million project will be breaking ground Friday, February 26th at 12:30pm.</p><p>Come 2014, this project could really bring some major changes to transportation through downtown St. Louis. It&#8217;s just too bad we have to wait so long.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-breaking-ground/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>I-64 reopening implications</title><link>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/i-64-reopening-implications</link> <comments>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/i-64-reopening-implications#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:36:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Matt Kastner</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dogtown]]></category> <category><![CDATA[earnest money]]></category> <category><![CDATA[I-64]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maplewood]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Richmond Heights]]></category> <category><![CDATA[title companies]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thresholdstl.com/?p=2146</guid> <description><![CDATA[
Although the impact of the Interstate 64 closure through St. Louis over the last two years has been less severe than most feared, it still had an impact nonetheless. Since we&#8217;ve all be inundated by news on the subject lately I won&#8217;t bore you with rehashes of other articles, but I did want to point [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="width: 290px; float:left; margin-right: 5px;"> <img
src="http://thresholdstl.com/blog/uploaded_images/2009/12/i-64-sign-opened.jpg" alt="This image has no alt text" /></p><p>Although the impact of the <strong>Interstate 64</strong> closure through St. Louis over the last two years has been less severe than most feared, it still had an impact nonetheless. Since we&#8217;ve all be inundated by news on the subject lately I won&#8217;t bore you with rehashes of other articles, but I did want to point out a couple of real estate-related affects.<span
id="more-2146"></span></p><p>The obvious one is that this closure has had an impact on anyone owning properties along the construction zone. Areas like <strong>Maplewood, Richmond Heights</strong> and <strong>Dogtown</strong> were probably the most negatively affected. The number of &#8220;For Rent&#8221; sings in these areas has been higher since the second phase of the project as would be assumed. Owners selling their homes have also had a harder time (at least at the prices that wanted) since most people would be reluctant to move-into an area in the midst of a traffic inducing construction project. Now that the project is over, and the flow of traffic goes back to normal, these areas can go back to their normal patterns.</p><p>Since I don&#8217;t do a ton of transactions in the areas listed above, I haven&#8217;t really witnessed this impact first hand. The one thing that I have had to deal with over the last two years is the pain in getting to title companies. For whatever reason, most title companies I have to use on all these foreclosure deals are around I-64. <strong>First American</strong> in Brentwood, <strong>Mokan, Investors and Continental</strong> in Clayton, and <strong>Bankers &amp; Lenders</strong> as well as a few others further out. With having to drop off earnest money or show up for closings a couple times each week, the overly-long routes to these places have proven to be a huge pain.</p><p>For the time this reopening is going to shave off these trips, I am most thankful. If you are an agent yourself or an investor who buys a lot of properties I&#8217;m sure you can relate. It&#8217;s nice to be able to get where you are going without going in a circle. It&#8217;s good to simply be back to normal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/i-64-reopening-implications/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mississippi River Bridge progresses</title><link>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-st-louis-progresses</link> <comments>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-st-louis-progresses#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Matt Kastner</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Arch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Highway 70]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mississippi River Bridge]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/?p=1224</guid> <description><![CDATA[
Despite the fact  that MODOT is putting the brakes on most new transportation projects, it seems that one high profile project hasn&#8217;t been affected: the new Mississippi River Bridge in Downtown St. Louis. I covered this project a lot in early 2008, but things have been pretty silent in the past year. The Post Dispatch [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="width: 290px; float:left; margin-right: 5px;"> <img
src="http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/blog/uploaded_images/2009/01/mississippi-river-bridge.jpg" alt="This image has no alt text" /></p><p>Despite the fact  that MODOT is putting the brakes on most new transportation projects, it seems that one high profile project hasn&#8217;t been affected: the new Mississippi River Bridge in Downtown St. Louis. <span
id="more-1224"></span>I <a
href="http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/st-louis-development/mississippi-river-bridge-a-done-deal/" target="_blank">covered</a> this project a lot in early 2008, but things have been pretty silent in the past year. The Post Dispatch is <a
href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/B70773DA97F155488625753E000DD709?OpenDocument" target="_blank">reporting</a> it likely that the $640 million project will break ground in 2010 with a construction timetable between four and six years. It seems that Missouri&#8217;s funding for the project is in place, and that the portion to be fronted by the State of Illinois should be ready by the end of the year. One way or another. Information on the initial phase can be found <a
href="http://www.newriverbridge.org/initialphase.asp" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p>It&#8217;s a shame that this project is going to take so long to complete, but there is no doubt that, when finished, it will open up a variety of new options for reconnecting the Arch grounds with Downtown. Perhaps our civic leaders will step up their game on that pone to take advantage of these upcoming changes. Keep your fingers crossed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/mississippi-river-bridge-st-louis-progresses/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Metro cuts public transportation</title><link>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/metro-cuts-public-transportation</link> <comments>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/metro-cuts-public-transportation#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:11:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Matt Kastner</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Metrolink]]></category> <category><![CDATA[public transportation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/?p=1179</guid> <description><![CDATA[
In a move that Metro has been threatening since Proposition M failed in November, the Metro governing board has approved a proposal to trim service starting March 30, 2009 in order to drastically reduce costs by $36 million a year.The move is expected to hit the bus and Call-A-Ride service outside of the Highway 270 [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p
style="width: 290px; float:left; margin-right: 5px;"> <img
src="http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/blog/uploaded_images/2008/12/metrolink-cuts.jpg" alt="This image has no alt text" /></p><p>In a move that Metro has been threatening since Proposition M failed in November, the Metro governing board has <a
href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/commutingtraffic/story/2425460E4C98C59686257524005F11B0?OpenDocument#tp_newCommentAnchor" target="_blank">approved</a> a proposal to trim service starting March 30, 2009 in order to drastically reduce costs by $36 million a year.<span
id="more-1179"></span>The move is expected to hit the bus and Call-A-Ride service outside of the Highway 270 loop especially hard, but it will also effect these services as well as Metrolink throughout the City and the rest of County.</p><p>This is really a said day for the St. Louis area. While Proposition M&#8217;s failure has been made into a County vs. City battle by many locally, that is not the issue to which I am referring. That is just the latest symptom of a greater problem: a separation of vision and reality. When the subject of public transportation comes up, everyone has a grandiose vision of have bus routes on rail tracks that cover the entire area. Expand, expand, expand is all you ever hear. Just last year there was a lot of talk of a huge <a
href="http://stlinvestmentrealty.com/st-louis-spotlight/expand-the-st-louis-metrolink-system-again/" target="_blank">North-South Expansion</a> of Metrolink in the City. But that&#8217;s not reality. The truth is that there isn&#8217;t enough money to cover the existing infrastructure let alone expand it. Ever few years they ask for more and more sales tax to support the system. This time it failed. That does not mean that people don&#8217;t care about or want public transportation. They just didn&#8217;t like this proposal.</p><p>We are plagued with poor leadership. We are plagued with mismanagement. We are plagued with the false notion that we can have our cake and eat it too. The complete disaster that was the Cross-County extension should make all that clear. Way over budget (more than $100 million over) and over-schedule (about 1 year), the project is a text book example of the &#8220;if you build it they will come&#8221; school of thought. St. Louis County got a major jump in service miles and St. Louis City brought the County deeper into the public transportation mix. The powers that be must have been thinking that this would open up a bottomless piggy-bank to sustain their unchecked budgets. But a slowing economy and a frustrated voter-base showed them that that assumption was wrong. Now there isn&#8217;t enough money to pay for everything and rather than look tot he root of the problem, the solution is to ask for more money throught he same tired old methods.</p><p>St. Louis needs to face a reality. We are low-density region. As such, the infrastructure to have routes covering the entire area as well as some would prefer is not feasible. When the street-car system was dismantled we lost the true fixed route system we had. Metrolink can never completely replace that. The money required is just too great. Every dollar of federal, state, county, city and grant money spent comes from somewhere. When those we entrust with the expansion and running of this system squander this money without care it&#8217;s time for a change. Can anyone blame a person who was sceptical about what will be done with that money?</p><p>Fingers can be pointed until the cows come home, but that won&#8217;t change this reality. We need to reinvent how this system is run and make it accountable for itself. If the demand is there, service expansions will come when needed, and most importantly, when they can be afforded. St. Louis deserves better than this, and I&#8217;m not just talking about public transportation. Its not going to be handed to us on a silver platter though. We need to quit looking towards Jefferson City and Washington DC to solve all our problems. We&#8217;re going to have to get over our perpetual inferiority complex and take control of the matter ourselves. If we don&#8217;t we&#8217;ll continue to wallow in the realm of mid-tier cities for another century.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://thresholdstl.com/other_topics/transportation-other_topics/metro-cuts-public-transportation/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/23 queries in 0.103 seconds using disk

Served from: linhost154.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net @ 2010-03-12 01:53:22 -->